<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957</id><updated>2011-04-21T21:39:43.271-04:00</updated><category term='Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007'/><category term='Medicaid'/><category term='PMA'/><category term='Electronic Health Records'/><category term='Joint Commission'/><category term='Pharmaceutical Industry'/><category term='False Certification'/><category term='Joint Ventures'/><category term='Fiduciary Duty'/><category term='TN Attorney General Opinion'/><category term='Filing a Claim'/><category term='Health Care Quality Improvement Act (HCQIA)'/><category term='FDA'/><category term='Genetics'/><category term='Discovery'/><category term='Sentencing Guidelines'/><category term='Prescription Drug Marketing Act'/><category term='ERISA'/><category term='Accreditation'/><category term='Dietary Supplements'/><category term='Statutes and Regulations'/><category term='Compliance'/><category term='Corporate Governance'/><category term='Deficit Reduction Act of 2005'/><category term='Regulations'/><category term='Participating Provider Agreements'/><category term='Healthcare Employment'/><category term='Nonphysician Providers'/><category term='Privacy'/><category term='Marketing'/><category term='Preemption'/><category term='Advanced Practice Nurse'/><category term='Healthcare Investments'/><category term='Hospital Costs'/><category term='Health Law Practice'/><category term='Disciplinary Proceeding'/><category term='Research and Development Costs'/><category term='Federal Subject Matter Jurisdiction'/><category term='Physician Assistant'/><category term='International Serious Adverse Events Consortium'/><category term='Non-Compete Agreements'/><category term='Health Insurance'/><category term='Epidemiology'/><category term='Staff Privileges'/><category term='Medical Malpractice'/><category term='EMTALA'/><category term='ATSDR'/><category term='Peer Review Privilege'/><category term='Nursing Home Patient Protection Act of 2008'/><category term='Centers for Disease Control'/><category term='U.S. Supreme Court'/><category term='Employee Relationship'/><category term='False Claims Act'/><category term='TN Medical Malpractice Claims Report'/><category term='Telemedicine'/><category term='Patents'/><category term='Hospitalists'/><category term='Healthcare Spending'/><category term='NCQA'/><category term='Big Pharma'/><category term='Off-Label Use'/><category term='HIT'/><category term='Prospective Payment System'/><category term='Sixth Circuit'/><category term='Intended Use (Drugs)'/><category term='Discovery Rule'/><category term='Antitrust'/><category term='Vicarious Liability'/><category term='FTC'/><category term='FSMB'/><category term='Restructuring'/><category term='HIPAA'/><category term='Nonprofits'/><category term='Hospital'/><category term='Hospital Negligence'/><category term='TennCare'/><category term='Business Judgment Rule'/><category term='Capacity'/><category term='Behind-the-Counter Drugs (BTC)'/><category term='Doctor Shopping'/><category term='CMS'/><category term='Patient Safety Act'/><category term='Corporate Negligence'/><category term='Statute of Limitation'/><category term='Patient Abandonment'/><category term='Religious Freedom'/><category term='Labor'/><category term='Tax Exemption'/><category term='Anticipatory Breach of Contract'/><category term='Venture Capital'/><category term='Medicare Conditions of Participation'/><category term='Anti-Kickback'/><category term='Physician'/><category term='Enforcement'/><category term='Drug Labeling'/><category term='Healthcare Access'/><category term='HMOs'/><category term='Apparent Authority'/><category term='Quality of Care'/><category term='Bylaws'/><category term='Discrimination'/><category term='Document Retention Policies'/><category term='Nursing Homes'/><category term='Clinical Testing'/><category term='Medical Device'/><category term='Tennessee Uniform Administrative Procedure Act'/><category term='ADA'/><category term='Reimbursement'/><category term='Proposed Rules'/><category term='Drug Safety'/><category term='License Suspension'/><category term='AHRQ'/><category term='RICO'/><category term='Statute of Repose'/><category term='Negligent Supervision'/><category term='Informed Consent'/><category term='NHIN'/><category term='Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act'/><category term='Healthcare'/><category term='SCHIP'/><category term='Medicare Fraud'/><category term='Attorney-Client Privilege'/><category term='Unauthorized Practice of Law'/><category term='Patient Rights'/><category term='Constitutional Rights'/><category term='Corporate Fraud'/><category term='Health Insurance Mandates'/><category term='Tobacco'/><category term='Community Benefit Standard'/><category term='Book'/><category term='Shareholder Derivative Suit'/><category term='Nonprofit Healthcare Representation'/><category term='Final Rule'/><category term='Transparency'/><category term='Abortion'/><category term='Managed Care'/><category term='Fraud and Abuse'/><category term='Healthcare Directors'/><category term='Terminally Ill'/><category term='Federal False Claims Act'/><category term='Drugs and Devices'/><category term='Presidential Candidates'/><category term='Clinical Trial'/><category term='Vegetative State'/><category term='Stark Laws'/><category term='Medicare'/><category term='Governance'/><category term='Arbitration'/><category term='Terminating Doctor-Patient Relationship'/><category term='Drug Prices'/><category term='Universal Health Care'/><category term='Tennessee'/><category term='Doctor-Patient Relationship'/><category term='Piercing the Veil'/><category term='Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act'/><category term='Generics'/><category term='E-Prescribing'/><category term='Duty of Care'/><category term='Insolvency'/><category term='Medicare Part D'/><category term='Biotechnology'/><category term='PPOs'/><category term='HHS'/><category term='Healthcare Costs'/><category term='Follow-on Biologics'/><category term='Vaccines'/><category term='Self-Referral'/><category term='Litigation'/><category term='User Fees'/><category term='Restraint and Seclusion'/><category term='Products Liability'/><category term='Drug Marketing'/><category term='Criminal Prosecution'/><category term='Class-Action'/><category term='Gene Therapy'/><category term='Physician Disclosure Bill'/><category term='Medicare Medicaid and SCHIP Extension Act of 2007'/><category term='Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006'/><category term='Superseding Cause'/><category term='Health Care Financial Transactions'/><category term='Certified Nurse Practitioner'/><title type='text'>TN Health Law Update</title><subtitle type='html'></subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><link rel='next' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default?start-index=101&amp;max-results=100'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>182</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-1359305197353603725</id><published>2009-04-30T11:36:00.004-04:00</published><updated>2009-04-30T11:39:40.845-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Tennessee'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Health Care Quality Improvement Act (HCQIA)'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Physician'/><title type='text'>U.S. Court in Tennessee Rejects Physician's Lawsuit Against Hospital that Revoked His Privileges</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health Lawyers Weekly, Vol. VII, Issue 16 (April 24, 2009) - AHLA]A physician could not maintain a breach of contract action against a hospital that revoked his privileges citing repeated concerns about unprofessional behavior that could harm patients, a federal trial court in Tennessee ruled.The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee found the hospital was entitled to</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/1359305197353603725'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/1359305197353603725'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2009/04/us-court-in-tennessee-rejects.html' title='U.S. Court in Tennessee Rejects Physician&apos;s Lawsuit Against Hospital that Revoked His Privileges'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-190445992395922037</id><published>2009-03-16T09:29:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2009-03-16T09:34:25.134-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Preemption'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='ERISA'/><title type='text'>Update: Ninth Circuit Denied En Banc Review of No ERISA Preemption Ruling</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health Lawyers Weekly, March 13, 2009, Vol. VII Issue 10 (AHLA)]The Ninth Circuit rejected March 9 the Golden Gate Restaurant Association’s (GGRA’s) petition for rehearing en banc of a three-judge panel decision that found the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) does not preempt a San Francisco Ordinance setting new healthcare spending mandates for employers.After a majority </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/190445992395922037'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/190445992395922037'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2009/03/update-ninth-circuit-denied-en-banc.html' title='Update: Ninth Circuit Denied En Banc Review of No ERISA Preemption Ruling'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-3846411953091619183</id><published>2009-01-28T09:44:00.006-05:00</published><updated>2009-01-28T10:05:29.426-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Preemption'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='ERISA'/><title type='text'>Updates: Ninth Circuit's decision on the effect of ERISA on the San Fransico Healthcare Ordinance</title><summary type='text'>Background issues here"Ninth Circuit Finds No ERISA Preemption of San Francisco Ordinance Mandating Employer Healthcare Expenditures"[October 3, 2008, Health Lawyers Weekly, Vol. VI, Issue 38, AHLA]In a closely watched decision, the Ninth Circuit ruled September 30 that the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) does not preempt a San Francisco Ordinance setting new healthcare spending </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/3846411953091619183'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/3846411953091619183'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2009/01/updates-ninth-circuits-decision-on.html' title='Updates: Ninth Circuit&apos;s decision on the effect of ERISA on the San Fransico Healthcare Ordinance'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-6389208726653890305</id><published>2008-07-02T14:34:00.005-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-02T14:58:35.822-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Tennessee'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Peer Review Privilege'/><title type='text'>TN Appeals Court Holds that Tennessee Peer Review Law Applies to the "Admissibility" of Peer Review-Related Information</title><summary type='text'>Roy v. City of Harriman, E2007-00785-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. June 30, 2008)In a recent Tennessee Court of Appeals case, the court held that the Tennessee Peer Review Law creates a privilege that bars not only the discovery of peer review-related information, but also the use of such information.This cause of action arises out of statements made by Dr. William E. Bennett to PHP Companies, Inc. (</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/6389208726653890305'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/6389208726653890305'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2008/07/tennessee-court-clarifies-that.html' title='TN Appeals Court Holds that Tennessee Peer Review Law Applies to the &quot;Admissibility&quot; of Peer Review-Related Information'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-6635025340513174160</id><published>2008-06-30T21:28:00.005-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-01T10:57:06.817-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Tennessee'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Medical Malpractice'/><title type='text'>Plaintiff in Medical Malpractice Action Must File Certificate of Good Faith</title><summary type='text'>Ch. 919, 2008 Tenn. Pub. Acts (effective Oct. 1, 2008)TN Public Chapter No. 919 amended Title 29, Chapter 26, Part 1 of the Tennessee Code Annotated to require plaintiffs or plaintiff's counsel to file a Certificate of Good Faith within 90 days after filing a complaint in any medical malpractice action in which expert testimony is required by § 29-26-115. The Certificate of Good Faith shall state</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/6635025340513174160'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/6635025340513174160'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2008/06/plaintiff-in-medical-malpractice-action.html' title='Plaintiff in Medical Malpractice Action Must File Certificate of Good Faith'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-2211742627213455522</id><published>2008-06-29T15:07:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2008-06-29T15:12:43.744-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Fraud and Abuse'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Tennessee'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='TennCare'/><title type='text'>U.S. Court In Tennessee Upholds Exclusion From Participation In Federal Healthcare Programs Applied To “Convicted” Physician</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health Lawyers Weekly, Vol. 6, Iss. 25, June 27, 2008 - AHLA]The Department of Health and Human Services Secretary correctly determined that a physician who pled nolo contendere on charges of attempting to defraud TennCare, Tennessee’s Medicaid managed care program, was “convicted” of a criminal offense under applicable federal statutes and therefore subject to a mandatory five-year </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/2211742627213455522'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/2211742627213455522'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2008/06/us-court-in-tennessee-upholds-exclusion.html' title='U.S. Court In Tennessee Upholds Exclusion From Participation In Federal Healthcare Programs Applied To “Convicted” Physician'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-4720239001528075077</id><published>2008-06-14T00:59:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-08T15:57:55.588-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='False Claims Act'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='U.S. Supreme Court'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Sixth Circuit'/><title type='text'>U.S. Supreme Court Holds False Claims Act Requires Intent to Defraud Government</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health Lawyers Weekly, June 13, 2008, Vol. 6, Iss. 23 - AHLA]The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held June 9 that the False Claims Act (FCA) requires proof that the defendant “intended that the false statement be material to the Government’s decision to pay or approve the false claim.”The opinion, authored by Justice Samuel Alito, reversed a Sixth Circuit decision that held it was </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/4720239001528075077'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/4720239001528075077'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2008/06/us-supreme-court-holds-false-claims-act.html' title='U.S. Supreme Court Holds False Claims Act Requires Intent to Defraud Government'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-4839530154507772752</id><published>2008-06-03T20:14:00.006-04:00</published><updated>2008-06-03T20:25:47.785-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Vicarious Liability'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Tennessee'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Medical Malpractice'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Hospital'/><title type='text'>In medical malpractice action, TN Court of Appeals addresses whether hospital is vicariously liable for the acts of emergency room physician</title><summary type='text'>Thomas v. Oldfield, No. M2007-01693-COA-R3-CV (filed June 2, 2008)The issue on appeal in this medical malpractice action is whether the hospital is vicariously liable for the acts or omissions of an emergency room physician. The trial court summarily dismissed all claims against the hospital finding that it was not vicariously liable for the conduct of the emergency room physician because he was </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/4839530154507772752'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/4839530154507772752'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2008/06/in-medical-malpractice-action-tn-court.html' title='In medical malpractice action, TN Court of Appeals addresses whether hospital is vicariously liable for the acts of emergency room physician'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-7109511600565186607</id><published>2008-05-31T19:32:00.004-04:00</published><updated>2008-05-31T19:38:35.609-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Federal Subject Matter Jurisdiction'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Tennessee'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Health Care Quality Improvement Act (HCQIA)'/><title type='text'>Federal District Court in Tennessee finds no subject matter jurisdiction in physician's breach of contract claim</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health Lawyers Weekly, May 30, 2008 (Vol. 6, Iss. 21) - AHLA]A federal district court ruled May 19 that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over a physician’s breach of contract and related claims against a hospital that suspended his medical staff privileges following a peer review audit of patient records.In granting the plaintiff-physician’s motion to remand the case back to state </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/7109511600565186607'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/7109511600565186607'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2008/05/federal-district-court-in-tennessee.html' title='Federal District Court in Tennessee finds no subject matter jurisdiction in physician&apos;s breach of contract claim'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-6634619059549046091</id><published>2008-05-31T19:04:00.004-04:00</published><updated>2008-05-31T19:22:34.256-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Vicarious Liability'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Tennessee'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Medical Malpractice'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Hospital'/><title type='text'>TN Supreme Court addresses the issue of hospital vicarious liability under apparent agency theory</title><summary type='text'>[Sources: Health Lawyers Weekly, May 30, 2008 (Vol. 6, Iss. 21) - AHLA]Two hospitals in separate medical malpractice actions may be liable for the alleged negligence of certain independent contractor physicians based on an apparent agency theory, the Tennessee Supreme Court ruled recently.Reversing appeals court decisions granting summary judgment in the hospitals’ favor, the high court found </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/6634619059549046091'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/6634619059549046091'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2008/05/tn-supreme-court-addresses-issue-of.html' title='TN Supreme Court addresses the issue of hospital vicarious liability under apparent agency theory'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-3597581316803362612</id><published>2008-05-16T20:14:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-05-17T02:18:06.352-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Tennessee'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='TennCare'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Hospital'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Hospital Costs'/><title type='text'>News Updates</title><summary type='text'>More hospitals requiring payment before treatmentIn a front-page story, the Wall Street Journal (4/28, A1, Martinez) reports that many "[h]ospitals are adopting a policy to improve their finances: making medical care contingent on upfront payments." According to the American Hospital Association, "[u]ncompensated care cost the hospital industry $31.2 billion in 2006, up 44 percent from $21.6 </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/3597581316803362612'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/3597581316803362612'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2008/05/news-updates.html' title='News Updates'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-20597329317354067</id><published>2008-04-18T01:22:00.008-04:00</published><updated>2008-04-18T01:34:08.323-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Employee Relationship'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Tennessee'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Hospital'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Bylaws'/><title type='text'>Tennessee Court of Appeals finds Hospital's Bylaws Part of Physician's Employment Contract</title><summary type='text'>The Tennessee Court of Appeals recently found that a hospital's bylaws were part of a physician's employment contract. In James C. Gekas, M.D. v. Seton Corporation, d/b/a Baptist Hospital, the plaintiff physician sued the defendant hospital for breach of contract after the hospital declined to promote him to a permanent position on its medical staff. He claimed that the hospital’s bylaws were </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/20597329317354067'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/20597329317354067'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2008/04/tennessee-court-of-appeals-find.html' title='Tennessee Court of Appeals finds Hospital&apos;s Bylaws Part of Physician&apos;s Employment Contract'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-1428703145384271085</id><published>2008-04-13T23:44:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-04-13T23:46:55.572-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Drugs and Devices'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Preemption'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='FDA'/><title type='text'>Federal Preemption: The Drug and Device Trilogy</title><summary type='text'>"Federal Preemption: The Drug and Device Trilogy" by J. Carter Thompson, Jr., Stephanie M. Rippee, and Amy L. Champagne, Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell &amp; Berkowitz, PC[Source: Health Lawyers Weekly, Vol. 6, Iss. 11 - AHLA]</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/1428703145384271085'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/1428703145384271085'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2008/04/federal-preemption-drug-and-device.html' title='Federal Preemption: The Drug and Device Trilogy'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-2077223950091368318</id><published>2008-04-13T23:35:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-04-13T23:36:15.720-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Doctor-Patient Relationship'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Terminating Doctor-Patient Relationship'/><title type='text'>Lawyers offer guidance for terminating physician-patient relationship.</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health and Life Sciences Law Daily, March 24, 2008 - AHLA]The Boston Business Journal (3/21, van der Pool) reported that "healthcare lawyers...say that in recent years they have fielded more inquiries from doctors and healthcare organizations about the best way to terminate a doctor-patient relationship." Since physicians are "under ethical and legal obligations to provide medical </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/2077223950091368318'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/2077223950091368318'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2008/04/lawyers-offer-guidance-for-terminating.html' title='Lawyers offer guidance for terminating physician-patient relationship.'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-745596905489951451</id><published>2008-04-13T23:29:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-04-13T23:33:31.041-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Health Insurance Mandates'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Health Insurance'/><title type='text'>Law Professor Questions Constitutionality of Health Insurance Mandates</title><summary type='text'>["Not So Fast on the Health Insurance Mandates" by Karl Manheim, Professor of Law, Loyola Law School Los Angeles, and Jamie Court, Chairman of the Santa Monica-based Consumer Watchdog - The Los Angeles Times, March 24, 2008]Are health insurance mandates constitutional? They are certainly unprecedented. The federal government does not ordinarily require Americans to purchase particular goods or </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/745596905489951451'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/745596905489951451'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2008/04/law-professor-questions.html' title='Law Professor Questions Constitutionality of Health Insurance Mandates'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-1228134927751902834</id><published>2008-04-13T22:56:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-04-13T22:58:23.084-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Tennessee'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='EMTALA'/><title type='text'>U.S. Court In Tennessee Finds Hospital Not Liable Under EMTALA For Transferring Inpatient Who Developed Emergency Condition</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health Lawyers Weekly, Vol. 6, Iss. 13 - AHLA]A Tennessee hospital is not liable under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) for transferring a patient who developed an emergency condition 17 days after she was admitted for hemodialysis to treat her kidney disease, a federal district court in that state ruled March 24.The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/1228134927751902834'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/1228134927751902834'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2008/04/us-court-in-tennessee-finds-hospital.html' title='U.S. Court In Tennessee Finds Hospital Not Liable Under EMTALA For Transferring Inpatient Who Developed Emergency Condition'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-5026000846815457410</id><published>2008-04-13T22:43:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2008-04-13T22:45:42.448-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Medicare Part D'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='CMS'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='E-Prescribing'/><title type='text'>CMS Issues Final E-Prescribing Rule</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health Lawyers Weekly, Vol 6, Iss. 13 - AHLA)The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a final rule April 2 establishing Part D e-prescribing standards for formulary and benefits, medication history, fill status notification, and identification of individual healthcare providers.The new standards apply to all Part D sponsors, as well as to prescribers and dispensers </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/5026000846815457410'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/5026000846815457410'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2008/04/cms-issues-final-e-prescribing-rule.html' title='CMS Issues Final E-Prescribing Rule'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-7736258852453834805</id><published>2008-04-13T22:35:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2008-04-13T22:40:09.868-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Nursing Homes'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Tennessee'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Litigation'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Nursing Home Patient Protection Act of 2008'/><title type='text'>Tennessee nursing homes pushing for lawsuit limits.</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health and Life Sciences Law Daily, April 7, 2008 - AHLA]The Tennessean (4/6, Emery) reported that "the nursing home industry as a whole is fighting to impose new limits" on lawsuits related to negligence. In Tennessee, the Nursing Home Patient Protection Act of 2008, a bill "under discussion in the state Legislature," would "keep many lawsuits out of courts altogether, make the cases </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/7736258852453834805'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/7736258852453834805'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2008/04/tennessee-nursing-homes-pushing-for.html' title='Tennessee nursing homes pushing for lawsuit limits.'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-105294258086316800</id><published>2008-04-13T22:15:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-04-13T22:26:27.191-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Preemption'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='FDA'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Pharmaceutical Industry'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Products Liability'/><title type='text'>Federal appeals court rules in favor of drugmakers in drug-label preemption case</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health and Life Sciences Law Daily, April 9, 2008 - AHLA]The Legal Intelligencer (4/9, Duffy) reports that in a 2-to-1 decision (pdf) issued Tuesday, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia, Pa., "ruled that the makers of Paxil (paroxetine) and Zoloft (sertraline) cannot be sued for failing to warn of a risk of suicide because the Food &amp; Drug Administration (FDA) has </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/105294258086316800'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/105294258086316800'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2008/04/federal-appeals-court-rules-in-favor-of.html' title='Federal appeals court rules in favor of drugmakers in drug-label preemption case'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-1340465238364474999</id><published>2008-02-24T22:34:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-24T22:38:22.784-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Medicaid'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Medicare'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='HHS'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Patient Safety Act'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Proposed Rules'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Final Rule'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='CMS'/><title type='text'>Healthcare Final and Proposed Rules: Updates</title><summary type='text'>- CMS proposed rule on Medicaid premiums and cost sharing- CMS proposed rule on state Medicaid flexibility- CMS final rule on medical necessity determinations- CMS final rule on Medicare secondary payer amendments- CMS final rule reducing provider tax rate - HHS Proposed Rule implementing Patient Safety Act </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/1340465238364474999'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/1340465238364474999'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2008/02/healthcare-final-and-proposed-rules.html' title='Healthcare Final and Proposed Rules: Updates'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-7141075111647086035</id><published>2008-02-22T23:00:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-22T23:07:30.214-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Tennessee'/><title type='text'>TN Law Promotes Effective Communications Between Health Care Providers While Rendering Care to Patients</title><summary type='text'>Public Chapter No. 391 (Amends T.C.A. § 68-11-312)T.C.A. § 68-11-312(b) states: "There is no implied covenant of confidentiality or other restriction that precludes (1) health care providers from communicating with each other in the course of providing care and treatment to a patient, or (2) a health care provider from responding to a request from a hospital regarding entries in the patient's </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/7141075111647086035'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/7141075111647086035'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2008/02/tn-law-promotes-effective.html' title='TN Law Promotes Effective Communications Between Health Care Providers While Rendering Care to Patients'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-9823937846142008</id><published>2008-02-22T22:38:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-22T22:45:20.760-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='TN Attorney General Opinion'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Tennessee'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='TennCare'/><title type='text'>TN AG Opinion: Notice to Bureau of TennCare re: Medicaid/Medicare Benefits Due to Separation Asset Division</title><summary type='text'>Tennessee Attorney General Opinion No. 08-31, February 20, 2008(Notice to Bureau of TennCare re: Medicaid/Medicare Benefits Due to Separation Asset Division)Questions:In any case seeking a divorce or legal separation in which the disabled spouse has a conservator and is receiving either Medicare/Medicaid benefits, is notice to the Bureau ofTennCare required as a prerequisite to granting relief?In</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/9823937846142008'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/9823937846142008'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2008/02/tn-ag-opinion-notice-to-bureau-of.html' title='TN AG Opinion: Notice to Bureau of TennCare re: Medicaid/Medicare Benefits Due to Separation Asset Division'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-3203096856235090429</id><published>2008-02-22T22:06:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-22T22:20:16.817-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Medicaid'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='CMS'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Deficit Reduction Act of 2005'/><title type='text'>CMS Proposes Rules to Give States More Flexibility in Designing Medicaid Plans</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health Lawyers Weekly, February 22, 2008 - AHLA]The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) proposed a pair of rules February 22 that would give states more flexibility in designing their Medicaid programs and require increased cost-sharing from beneficiaries.The rules, which would implement provisions of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 and the Tax Relief and Health Care Act </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/3203096856235090429'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/3203096856235090429'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2008/02/cms-proposes-rules-to-give-states-more.html' title='CMS Proposes Rules to Give States More Flexibility in Designing Medicaid Plans'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-5514810845528837112</id><published>2008-02-21T15:24:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-21T15:28:25.388-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='PMA'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='FDA'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='U.S. Supreme Court'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Medical Device'/><title type='text'>U.S. Supreme Court limits suits targeting makers of FDA-approved medical devices.</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health and Life Sciences Law Daily, February 21, 2008 - AHLA]In a front-page story, the New York Times (2/21, A1, Greenhouse) reports that on Wednesday, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in the case of Riegel v. Medtronic Inc. (PDF) that "[m]akers of medical devices like implantable defibrillators or breast implants are immune from liability for personal injuries as long as the Food and Drug </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/5514810845528837112'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/5514810845528837112'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2008/02/us-supreme-court-limits-suits-targeting.html' title='U.S. Supreme Court limits suits targeting makers of FDA-approved medical devices.'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-5797009253602218915</id><published>2008-02-08T22:28:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-08T22:37:00.327-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Medicare Medicaid and SCHIP Extension Act of 2007'/><title type='text'>"Amendments To Medicare Secondary Payer Laws Impose Substantial New Reporting Obligations And Potential Civil Monetary Penalties For Non-Compliance"</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health Lawyers Weekly, February 8, 2008 - AHLA]By Janice Ziegler, Ramy Fayed, and Katie Pawlitz, Sonnenschein, Nath, and Rosenthal LLPOn December 19, 2007, Congress passed the Medicare, Medicaid and SCHIP Extension Act of 2007* (the Act), which included modifications to the Medicare Secondary Payer (MSP) laws. The Act, which was signed into law on December 29, 2007, imposes significant </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/5797009253602218915'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/5797009253602218915'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2008/02/amendments-to-medicare-secondary-payer.html' title='&quot;Amendments To Medicare Secondary Payer Laws Impose Substantial New Reporting Obligations And Potential Civil Monetary Penalties For Non-Compliance&quot;'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-8810529907140449490</id><published>2008-02-08T21:22:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-08T22:14:16.118-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Fraud and Abuse'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Corporate Governance'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Compliance'/><title type='text'>Compliance Series - OIG/AHLA</title><summary type='text'>Corporate Responsibility and Corporate Compliance: A Resource for Health Care Boards of Directors (4/2003)This educational resource is designed to help health care organization directors ask knowledgeable and appropriate questions related to health care corporate compliance. These questions are not intended to set forth any specific standard of care. Rather, this resource will help corporate </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/8810529907140449490'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/8810529907140449490'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2008/02/compliance-series-oigahla.html' title='Compliance Series - OIG/AHLA'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-8454926826464224320</id><published>2008-02-08T21:06:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-08T21:09:36.770-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Tennessee'/><title type='text'>Owens v. National Health Corporation [Corrected Opinion]</title><summary type='text'>Here is the corrected opinion, which replaces the opinion filed on November 8, 2007.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/8454926826464224320'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/8454926826464224320'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2008/02/owens-v-national-health-corporation.html' title='Owens v. National Health Corporation [Corrected Opinion]'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-2867397192827222498</id><published>2008-02-03T22:34:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-03T22:42:07.944-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Healthcare'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Health Insurance'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Healthcare Access'/><title type='text'>39 States Have Begun to Enact Comprehensive Healthcare Access Reform</title><summary type='text'>According to a study, A Progress Report On State Health Access Reform, published in Health Affairs, enactment of ambitious health reform laws in Massachusetts and Vermont in 2006 helped instigate a wave of state legislative activities to expand coverage to uninsured people. The study identifies thirty-nine states that have enacted laws in at least one access category since 2006. At least thirteen</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/2867397192827222498'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/2867397192827222498'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2008/02/39-states-have-begun-to-enact.html' title='39 States Have Begun to Enact Comprehensive Healthcare Access Reform'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-4500147115311117959</id><published>2008-02-03T21:16:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-03T21:31:07.072-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Health Care Financial Transactions'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Healthcare Investments'/><title type='text'>Hospital Investments in Competitiveness: Financing Options</title><summary type='text'>Waller Lansden publishes its 2007 Hospital Investments in Competiveness: Financing Options survey.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/4500147115311117959'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/4500147115311117959'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2008/02/hospital-investments-in-competitiveness.html' title='Hospital Investments in Competitiveness: Financing Options'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-5039731311764274224</id><published>2008-02-03T20:16:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-03T20:24:07.464-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='False Claims Act'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Tennessee'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='False Certification'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Medicare Conditions of Participation'/><title type='text'>Tennessee Court Rejects False Certification Claim</title><summary type='text'>In Waller Lansden's Healthcare blog, attorneys Jim Mathis and Josh Collins note that the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee recently dismissed a qui tam suit brought against Baptist Medical Center in Memphis, Tenn., which alleged that Baptist violated the False Claims Act (FCA) by falsely certifying compliance with Medicare’s Conditions of Participation (CoPs).  The court </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/5039731311764274224'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/5039731311764274224'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2008/02/tennessee-court-rejects-false.html' title='Tennessee Court Rejects False Certification Claim'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-6571162701384390768</id><published>2008-02-03T19:03:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-03T19:19:46.390-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Venture Capital'/><title type='text'>Venture Capital Activity Expected to Rise in 2008, Survey Finds</title><summary type='text'>FierceBiotech reports that according to a recent survey of more than 350 venture capitalists, entrepreneurs, corporate buyers, investment bankers and research analysts, KPMG, LLP (the U.S. audit, tax and advisory firm) found that 51 percent of respondents expected venture capital activity to continure rising in 2008. Of those surveyed, 24 percent indicated that greentech/cleantech sectors will </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/6571162701384390768'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/6571162701384390768'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2008/02/venture-capital-activity-expected-to.html' title='Venture Capital Activity Expected to Rise in 2008, Survey Finds'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-4359500367183141647</id><published>2008-02-03T18:50:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-03T18:52:51.496-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Healthcare Employment'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Hospital'/><title type='text'>Employment Edges Up at Hospital and Physician Offices</title><summary type='text'>Modern Healthcare Online reports: Hospitals added roughly 10,000 workers in January, climbing 0.2%, to bring total hospital employment to about 4.58 million, according to seasonally adjusted figures from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. All figures are preliminary. For the 12 months ended in January, hospital payrolls added nearly 112,600 workers, an increase of 2.5%.Physician office employment </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/4359500367183141647'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/4359500367183141647'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2008/02/employment-edges-up-at-hospital-and.html' title='Employment Edges Up at Hospital and Physician Offices'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-7873530831187058996</id><published>2008-02-03T18:15:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-03T18:30:19.512-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Tennessee'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Drug Marketing'/><title type='text'>Vanderbilt To Ban Gifts from Drug Reps</title><summary type='text'>The Tennessean reports: Vanderbilt Medical Center has decided to stop doctors, faculty members and others who work on campus from accepting meals or gifts from the drug industry in a bid to reduce the companies' influence on patient care and trim spending on drugs (the drug industry spends $25 billion a year on promotions to influence patients and doctors who write prescriptions). The plan will </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/7873530831187058996'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/7873530831187058996'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2008/02/vanderbilt-to-ban-gifts-from-drug-reps.html' title='Vanderbilt To Ban Gifts from Drug Reps'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-8157703611560506466</id><published>2008-02-01T12:46:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-01T12:59:38.276-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Preemption'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='FDA'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='U.S. Supreme Court'/><title type='text'>U.S. Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Five Preemption Cases</title><summary type='text'>Corporate Counsel reports: Corporate America has generally argued that the federal government should prevail over the states when they have conflicting laws and regulations. The question of who trumps whom is now before the U.S. Supreme Court, which has agreed to hear five cases involving preemption. The five preemption cases before the Supreme Court involve product liability, transportation of </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/8157703611560506466'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/8157703611560506466'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2008/02/us-supreme-court-agrees-to-hear-five.html' title='U.S. Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Five Preemption Cases'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-7642313314355297199</id><published>2008-01-27T13:50:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-01-27T13:54:52.921-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Drugs and Devices'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Preemption'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='FDA'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Drug Labeling'/><title type='text'>"Amendments To Labeling: Implications For Preemption Defense" by Joseph P. McMenamin and Deborah M. Russell, McGuireWoods LLP</title><summary type='text'>"Amendments to Labeling: Implications for Preemption Defense," Health Lawyers Weekly, AHLA, January 25, 2008 by Joseph P. McMenamin and Deborah M. Russell, McGuireWoods LLPIn what is sure to be seen as more ammunition for the battle over the preemption defense, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) proposes rulemaking to codify its longstanding view that changes to labeling for approved products</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/7642313314355297199'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/7642313314355297199'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2008/01/amendments-to-labeling-implications-for.html' title='&quot;Amendments To Labeling: Implications For Preemption Defense&quot; by Joseph P. McMenamin and Deborah M. Russell, McGuireWoods LLP'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-5007408822347359389</id><published>2008-01-27T13:33:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2008-01-27T13:39:42.866-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Fraud and Abuse'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Tennessee'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Sentencing Guidelines'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Sixth Circuit'/><title type='text'>Sixth Circuit Upholds 188 Months' Prison Sentence for TN Physician Convicted of Fraud</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health Lawyers Weekly, January 25, 2008 - AHLA]A Tennessee physician who was convicted of healthcare fraud and making false statements for administering partial doses of chemotherapy medications to cancer patients while billing for full doses received a “reasonable” prison sentence of 188 months (15 years, eight months), the Sixth Circuit ruled January 16.Among other issues, the appeals </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/5007408822347359389'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/5007408822347359389'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2008/01/sixth-circuit-upholds-188-months-prison.html' title='Sixth Circuit Upholds 188 Months&apos; Prison Sentence for TN Physician Convicted of Fraud'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-2899770289327571148</id><published>2008-01-27T13:11:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-01-27T13:29:31.327-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Preemption'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='ERISA'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='U.S. Supreme Court'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Universal Health Care'/><title type='text'>GGRA May Petition U.S. Supreme Court to Determine Whether ERISA Preempts a San Francisco Ordinance Setting Healthcare Spending Mandates for Employers</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health Lawyers Weekly, January 25, 2008 - AHLA]The Golden Gate Restaurant Association (GGRA) said January 21 that it has decided not to petition the full Ninth Circuit to overturn a unanimous panel decision allowing a San Francisco ordinance setting new healthcare spending mandates for employers to go into effect.A three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit in a January 9 order agreed to </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/2899770289327571148'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/2899770289327571148'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2008/01/ggra-may-petition-us-supreme-court-to.html' title='GGRA May Petition U.S. Supreme Court to Determine Whether ERISA Preempts a San Francisco Ordinance Setting Healthcare Spending Mandates for Employers'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-8407290565713543984</id><published>2008-01-07T19:49:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2008-01-07T19:50:04.660-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Medicaid'/><title type='text'>Bush administration imposing restrictions on states' abilities to expand Medicaid eligibility.</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health and Life Sciences Law Daily, January 4, 2008 - AHLA]In a front-page article, the New York Times (1/4, Pear) reports, "The Bush administration is imposing restrictions on the ability of states to expand eligibility for Medicaid." The restrictions prevent states "from offering coverage to families of modest incomes who, the administration argues, may have access to private health </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/8407290565713543984'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/8407290565713543984'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2008/01/bush-administration-imposing.html' title='Bush administration imposing restrictions on states&apos; abilities to expand Medicaid eligibility.'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-1115966955414339417</id><published>2008-01-07T19:29:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-01-07T19:32:18.820-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Tennessee'/><title type='text'>Tennessee grants funds to non-profit organization offering free sample medications to the uninsured.</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health and Life Sciences Law Daily, January 2, 2008 - AHLA]The AP (12/29) reported that the Dispensary of Hope, a "nonprofit organization that provides free sample medications to Tennesseans who don't have insurance, will be able to expand its program with the help of a $1 million grant from the state."  The funds will enable the program "to expand from three sites to nine in Tennessee."</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/1115966955414339417'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/1115966955414339417'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2008/01/tennessee-grants-funds-to-non-profit.html' title='Tennessee grants funds to non-profit organization offering free sample medications to the uninsured.'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-3509174845615554106</id><published>2007-12-31T15:34:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-12-31T15:47:20.164-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Pharmaceutical Industry'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Big Pharma'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Biotechnology'/><title type='text'>Big Pharma Takes Biotech Seriously in 2007</title><summary type='text'>FierceBiotech reports that: "2007 may well go down as the year that Big Pharma went beyond merely embracing biotechnology and decided that now was the time to marry up with the new technology. With Big Pharma's accountants totting up the last big rewards from a slew of blockbusters, biotech was seen at the next big thing in therapeutics, and companies were willing to spend big to get in the act."</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/3509174845615554106'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/3509174845615554106'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/12/big-pharma-takes-biotech-seriously-in.html' title='Big Pharma Takes Biotech Seriously in 2007'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-1767821620455191923</id><published>2007-12-14T22:34:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-12-14T22:37:06.487-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Tax Exemption'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Nonprofits'/><title type='text'>IRS Issues FY 2008 Exempt Organization Implementing Guidelines</title><summary type='text'>FY 2008 EO Implementing Guidelines</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/1767821620455191923'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/1767821620455191923'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/12/irs-issues-fy-2008-exempt-organization.html' title='IRS Issues FY 2008 Exempt Organization Implementing Guidelines'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-6630377756807308749</id><published>2007-12-14T21:59:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-12-14T22:26:34.646-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Tennessee'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Superseding Cause'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Medical Malpractice'/><title type='text'>Tennessee Court of Appeals Allows Jury Instruction on Superseding Cause</title><summary type='text'>In White v. Premier Med. Group, a wrongful death action, the decedent, Wastille Jones, was admitted to Gateway Medical Center with back pain and was negligently given an overdose of narcotics by the defendant, Scott William McLain, M.D.  Jones was subsequently transferred to ICU where she was intubated, but a mucous "plug" obstruted the endotracheal tube, restricting oxygen flow. Jones died the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/6630377756807308749'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/6630377756807308749'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/12/tennessee-court-of-appeals-allows-jury.html' title='Tennessee Court of Appeals Allows Jury Instruction on Superseding Cause'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-3871331914895361337</id><published>2007-12-14T21:14:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-12-14T21:38:19.025-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Corporate Governance'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Piercing the Veil'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Nonprofits'/><title type='text'>Court Confirms Application of "Alter Ego" Doctrine to Pierce the Veil of a Nonprofit Parent Corporation</title><summary type='text'>Michael W. Peregrine, of McDermott Will &amp; Emery LLP, writes in Health Lawyers Weekly (December 14, 2007), "The Return of Alter Ego": "In the recent decision, Network for Good v. United Way of the Bay Area, the San Francisco Superior Court applied the hoary legal concept of alter ego to allow a small charity to “pierce the corporate veil” of a United Way affiliate and attribute millions of dollars</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/3871331914895361337'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/3871331914895361337'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/12/court-confirms-application-of-alter-ego.html' title='Court Confirms Application of &quot;Alter Ego&quot; Doctrine to Pierce the Veil of a Nonprofit Parent Corporation'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-7317165304154430258</id><published>2007-12-14T11:07:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-12-14T21:03:25.464-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Products Liability'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Medical Device'/><title type='text'>Supreme Court Hears Testimony in Medical Device Suits</title><summary type='text'>The United States Supreme Court has granted certiorari to hear two cases to determine whether the manufacturer of a medical device approved for sale by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) can be sued for damages under state law if the device injures a patient. In particular, the Court will determine whether the express preemption provision of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/7317165304154430258'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/7317165304154430258'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/12/supreme-court-hears-medical-device-suit.html' title='Supreme Court Hears Testimony in Medical Device Suits'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-2263992420588186569</id><published>2007-12-14T00:00:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-12-14T00:05:43.002-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Tennessee'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='ERISA'/><title type='text'>U.S. Court In Tennessee Holds PBM Was Not ERISA Fiduciary</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health Lawyers Weekly, December 7, 2007 - AHLA]A pharmaceutical benefits manager (PBM) was not a fiduciary under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) by virtue of the services it provided pursuant to its contract with the sponsor of an employee benefits plan, a federal trial court in Tennessee ruled November 13.. . . .Plaintiff alleged Caremark acted as an ERISA </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/2263992420588186569'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/2263992420588186569'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/12/us-court-in-tennessee-holds-pbm-was-not.html' title='U.S. Court In Tennessee Holds PBM Was Not ERISA Fiduciary'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-6263019450075952688</id><published>2007-11-27T12:20:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-11-27T12:23:14.744-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='CMS'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Reimbursement'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Hospital'/><title type='text'>CMS proposes linking hospital performance to Medicare reimbursements.</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health and Life Sciences Law Daily, November 27, 2007 - AHLA]CQ Healthbeat (11/27, Carey) reports, "The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) on Monday sent a series of options to Capitol Hill to change Medicare hospital payment so that it is based on the quality of care a facility delivers." Building on the existing Medicare "Value-Based Purchasing Program," which "pays </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/6263019450075952688'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/6263019450075952688'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/11/cms-proposes-linking-hospital.html' title='CMS proposes linking hospital performance to Medicare reimbursements.'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-1478230292750359725</id><published>2007-11-16T21:58:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-11-16T22:23:10.065-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Healthcare Spending'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Healthcare Costs'/><title type='text'>CBO Projects Health Care Costs Could Reach 49% of GDP by 2082</title><summary type='text'>In a November 2007 CBO Study, "The Long-Term Outlook for Health Care Spending," the CBO suggested that, in the absence of changes in federal law:Total spending on health care would rise from 16 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) in 2007 to 25 percent in 2025, 37 percent in 2050, and 49 percent in 2082.Federal spending on Medicare (net of beneficiaries' premiums) and Medicaid would rise from </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/1478230292750359725'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/1478230292750359725'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/11/cbo-projects-health-care-costs-could.html' title='CBO Projects Health Care Costs Could Reach 49% of GDP by 2082'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_7q1Jyi82f1s/Rz5dsrmmg7I/AAAAAAAAAAM/f9CrKHMfLG4/s72-c/table1.gif' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-4418416771674786849</id><published>2007-11-16T21:44:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-08T21:10:55.785-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Tennessee'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Arbitration'/><title type='text'>Tennessee Supreme Court Holds Attorney-In-Fact Could Bind Resident To Arbitration Agreement</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health Lawyers Weekly, November 16, 2007 - AHLA]A durable power of attorney for healthcare authorizes the attorney-in-fact to enter into an arbitration agreement on behalf of a resident as part of a nursing home’s admissions process, the Tennessee Supreme Court held November 8.Thus, the appeals court upheld the pre-dispute arbitration agreement in so far as plaintiff argued the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/4418416771674786849'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/4418416771674786849'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/11/tennessee-supreme-court-holds-attorney.html' title='Tennessee Supreme Court Holds Attorney-In-Fact Could Bind Resident To Arbitration Agreement'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-4608784623643975390</id><published>2007-11-16T09:28:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-11-16T09:47:01.650-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Drugs and Devices'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Drug Safety'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Corporate Governance'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Shareholder Derivative Suit'/><title type='text'>Shareholders sue Sanofi-Aventis after FDA rejects diet drug</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health and Life Sciences Law Daily, November 16, 2007 - AHLA]Fortune Magazine (11/16, Simons) reports, "The world's third-largest drug company, Sanofi-Aventis is facing a shareholder lawsuit for allegedly hyping a weight-loss pill that eventually failed to pass FDA muster." The class-action lawsuit alleges "that Sanofi's statements regarding anti-obesity drug, Zumulti, 'were materially </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/4608784623643975390'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/4608784623643975390'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/11/shareholders-sue-sanofi-aventis-after.html' title='Shareholders sue Sanofi-Aventis after FDA rejects diet drug'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-8234190110946616469</id><published>2007-11-15T16:49:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-11-15T16:52:32.923-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Epidemiology'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='HIPAA'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Privacy'/><title type='text'>Patient Privacy Rules under HIPAA May Come At a Cost</title><summary type='text'>Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report: The medical privacy rule issued following passage of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act might limit the ability of epidemiologists to conduct studies in the U.S., according to a study published on Wednesday in the Journal of the American Medical Association, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reports (Fahy, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, 11/13).The HIPAA</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/8234190110946616469'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/8234190110946616469'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/11/hipaa-privacy-rules-may-come-at-cost.html' title='Patient Privacy Rules under HIPAA May Come At a Cost'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-7393552811795247599</id><published>2007-11-15T16:38:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-11-15T16:41:17.029-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='CMS'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='E-Prescribing'/><title type='text'>CMS Proposes E-Prescribing Standards</title><summary type='text'>Healthcare Financial Management Association (HFMA): On Nov. 13, HHS Secretary Mike Leavitt announced that the department, through the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), is proposing rules to adopt new standards to advance the use of electronic prescribing (e-prescribing) for formulary and benefit as well as medication history transactions used under the Medicare prescription drug </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/7393552811795247599'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/7393552811795247599'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/11/cms-proposes-e-prescribing-standards.html' title='CMS Proposes E-Prescribing Standards'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-3761087067334136309</id><published>2007-11-15T16:29:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-11-16T09:50:04.628-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Quality of Care'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Joint Commission'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Hospital'/><title type='text'>The Joint Commission Annual Report Shows Further Improvement in Health Care Quality in Nation’s Hospitals</title><summary type='text'>The Joint Commission, in a recent press release, shows that according to its second annual report on health care quality and patient safety in the nation's hospitals, American hospitals are making measurable strides in the quality of care provided for patients with heart attacks, heart failure, pneumonia and surgical conditions.Among the specific findings in the 2007 report:Accredited hospitals </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/3761087067334136309'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/3761087067334136309'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/11/joint-commission-annual-report-shows.html' title='The Joint Commission Annual Report Shows Further Improvement in Health Care Quality in Nation’s Hospitals'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-6381580256234795843</id><published>2007-11-14T16:04:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-11-29T12:02:55.391-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Tennessee'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Non-Compete Agreements'/><title type='text'>New TN law sets forth parameters for reasonable non-compete covenants between health care providers and employees</title><summary type='text'>Public Chapter 487NON-COMPETE COVENANTS BEWEEN HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS AND EMPLOYEESThis new law sets forth parameters for reasonable non-compete covenants between health care providers and employees upon termination or conclusion of the employment or contractual relationship. It applies to health care providers licensed by the Board of Registration in Podiatry, Board of Chiropractic Examiners, </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/6381580256234795843'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/6381580256234795843'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/11/new-tn-law-sets-forth-parameters-for.html' title='New TN law sets forth parameters for reasonable non-compete covenants between health care providers and employees'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-3095434488329524319</id><published>2007-11-14T11:15:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-11-14T11:16:45.346-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Drugs and Devices'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='FDA'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Behind-the-Counter Drugs (BTC)'/><title type='text'>FDA to hear arguments over proposed new "behind-the-counter" drug class.</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health and Life Sciences Law Daily, November 14, 2007 - AHLA]HealthDay (11/14, Reinberg) reports, "Experts at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration are meeting Wednesday to hear arguments on whether or not pharmacists might someday bypass doctors and directly provide consumers with certain drugs that now require a prescription." If such a plan is adopted, "it would create a new class of </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/3095434488329524319'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/3095434488329524319'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/11/fda-to-hear-arguments-over-proposed-new.html' title='FDA to hear arguments over proposed new &quot;behind-the-counter&quot; drug class.'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-9014519328693440851</id><published>2007-11-14T11:10:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-11-14T11:12:52.492-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Fraud and Abuse'/><title type='text'>GAO report finds 30,000 Medicaid providers did not pay federal taxes in 2006.</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health and Life Sciences Law Daily, November 14, 2007 - AHLA] USA Today (11/14, Wolf) reports, "More than 30,000 Medicaid providers in seven states failed to pay more than $1 billion in federal taxes last year, but the government can't trim healthcare payments in order to collect," according to a report by the Government Accountability Office (GAO). "In its fifth report to a Senate panel</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/9014519328693440851'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/9014519328693440851'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/11/gao-report-finds-30000-medicaid.html' title='GAO report finds 30,000 Medicaid providers did not pay federal taxes in 2006.'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-1333956338079841029</id><published>2007-11-07T11:25:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-11-07T11:26:51.982-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Abortion'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Sixth Circuit'/><title type='text'>Federal court upholds dismissal of "Roe v. Wade for Men" lawsuit.</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health and Life Sciences Law Daily, November 7, 2007]The AP (11/7) reports that on Tuesday, a three-judge panel of the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals "upheld the dismissal of a lawsuit nicknamed 'Roe v. Wade for Men,'" which was filed on behalf of Matthew Dubay by the National Center for Men. Dubay "said he shouldn't have to pay child support for his ex-girlfriend's daughter," because</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/1333956338079841029'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/1333956338079841029'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/11/federal-court-upholds-dismissal-of-roe.html' title='Federal court upholds dismissal of &quot;Roe v. Wade for Men&quot; lawsuit.'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-5373325170610524906</id><published>2007-11-02T22:29:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2007-11-02T22:37:58.762-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Prospective Payment System'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Final Rule'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='CMS'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Reimbursement'/><title type='text'>CMS Issues New Rules for Physician Fees and for Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS)</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Healthcare Financial Management Association (HFMA)]CMS Issues 2008 Outpatient Prospective Payment System Final RuleOn Nov. 1, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) continued its initiative to link payment with quality in a final rule with comment period updating the hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS), effective for services furnished during CY08. The </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/5373325170610524906'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/5373325170610524906'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/11/cms-issues-new-rules-for-physician-fees.html' title='CMS Issues New Rules for Physician Fees and for Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS)'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-5950071037415626961</id><published>2007-11-02T21:49:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2007-11-02T22:04:33.655-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Hospital'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Hospital Costs'/><title type='text'>Cost of Uncompensated Hosptial Care Reached $31.2 Billion in 2006; Underpayments Reached $29.9 Billion</title><summary type='text'>The American Hosptial Association (AHA) released the results of its Annual Survey of Hospitals in October. In its Uncompensated Hospital Care Cost Fact Sheet, AHA said that the data from the Annual Survey showed that hospitals had uncompensated care costs amounting to $31.2 billion (5.7% of total expenses) in 2006. However, uncompensated care excludes other unfunded costs of care, such as </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/5950071037415626961'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/5950071037415626961'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/11/cost-of-uncompensated-hosptial-care.html' title='Cost of Uncompensated Hosptial Care Reached $31.2 Billion in 2006; Underpayments Reached $29.9 Billion'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-3596577552467103996</id><published>2007-11-02T21:21:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-11-02T21:35:56.145-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Preemption'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Medicare'/><title type='text'>District Court in Alabama to Determine Whether section 1395w-26(b)(3) of Medicare Act is a "Complete Preemption" Statute</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health Lawyers Weekly, November 2, 2007]The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Alabama granted a motion for interlocutory appeal October 15 on the question of whether whether § 1395w-26(b)(3) of the Medicare Act is a complete preemption statute. The court ruled in the instant case that at least some of plaintiffs' state law claims were completely preempted, while the same </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/3596577552467103996'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/3596577552467103996'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/11/district-court-in-alabama-to-determine.html' title='District Court in Alabama to Determine Whether section 1395w-26(b)(3) of Medicare Act is a &quot;Complete Preemption&quot; Statute'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-15242567396818946</id><published>2007-11-02T21:03:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-11-02T21:09:47.767-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Attorney-Client Privilege'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Discovery'/><title type='text'>New York Court Says A Physician's E-mails With Attorney on Hospital's E-mail System Not Privileged</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health Lawyer's Weekly, November 2, 2007]A physician's communications with his attorney via his hospital-employer’s email system were not protected from discovery under the attorney-client privilege or work product doctrine in a subsequent employment dispute, a New York court ruled October 17.According to the court, because hospital policy explicitly prohibited personal use of its email </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/15242567396818946'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/15242567396818946'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/11/new-york-court-says-physicians-e-mails.html' title='New York Court Says A Physician&apos;s E-mails With Attorney on Hospital&apos;s E-mail System Not Privileged'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-1080354661986586081</id><published>2007-11-02T20:13:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-11-02T20:34:13.708-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Tennessee'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Medical Malpractice'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='TN Medical Malpractice Claims Report'/><title type='text'>2007 Tennessee Medical Malpractice Claims Report - Judgments Down in 2006</title><summary type='text'>The Tennessee Department of Commerce &amp; Insurance released the 2007 Medical Malpractice Claims Report, which showed a decline in medical malpractice judgments and settlements in 2006. Tennessee trial courts issued six medical malpractice judgments totaling $4,951,459 (down from $6,075,724 in 2005). Settlements in 2006 occurred for 15.24% of medical malpractice claims, totaling damage payments of </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/1080354661986586081'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/1080354661986586081'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/11/2007-tennessee-medical-malpractice.html' title='2007 Tennessee Medical Malpractice Claims Report - Judgments Down in 2006'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-7470047966419942084</id><published>2007-11-02T09:48:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-11-02T09:56:15.749-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Drug Prices'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Medicare Part D'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='CMS'/><title type='text'>Medicare Part D spent $32 billion in 2006, study finds.</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health and Life Sciences Law Daily, November 2, 2007]HealthDay (11/2, Preidt) reports, "In 2006, introduction of the U.S. Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit increased the number of seniors' prescriptions by 158 million, at a cost of $32 billion to Medicare," according to a study published in the November/December issue of the journal Health Affairs. Co-author Frank Lichtenberg, a </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/7470047966419942084'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/7470047966419942084'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/11/medicare-part-d-spent-32-billion-in.html' title='Medicare Part D spent $32 billion in 2006, study finds.'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-115384532591598120</id><published>2007-10-24T18:48:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-10-24T18:52:36.690-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Physician Disclosure Bill'/><title type='text'>Some medical groups express support for physician disclosure bill.</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health and Life Sciences Law Daily, Oct. 24, 2007]Congressional Quarterly (10/24, Bloedorn) reports, "Several key medical groups have announced their support for legislation (S 2029) that would require pharmaceutical companies to report any gifts given to physicians." The legislation, "sponsored by Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa), and co-sponsored by Sen. Herb Kohl (D-Wis.)," would </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/115384532591598120'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/115384532591598120'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/10/some-medical-groups-express-support-for.html' title='Some medical groups express support for physician disclosure bill.'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-6386986277395678581</id><published>2007-10-19T20:18:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-10-19T20:21:30.105-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Healthcare'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Presidential Candidates'/><title type='text'>Interactive Online Tool Provides Side-by-Side Comparisons of Presidential Healthcare Proposals</title><summary type='text'>The Kaiser Family Foundation has released an interactive online tool to compare the healthcare proposals of presidential candidates. The tool, 2008 Presidential Candidate Health Care Proposals: Side-by-Side Summary, summarizes positions in four overall categories: access to healthcare coverage, cost containment, improving the quality of care, and financing.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/6386986277395678581'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/6386986277395678581'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/10/interactive-online-tool-provides-side.html' title='Interactive Online Tool Provides Side-by-Side Comparisons of Presidential Healthcare Proposals'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-6172513059617293921</id><published>2007-10-19T19:48:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-10-19T19:50:29.025-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Nonprofit Healthcare Representation'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Governance'/><title type='text'>Nonprofit Panel Releases Principles For Good Governance</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health Lawyers Weekly, October 19, 2007]The Panel on the Nonprofit Sector has released Principles for Good Governance and Ethical Practice: A Guide for Charities and Foundations aimed at helping organizations strengthen their effectiveness and accountability.The Guide describes six principles that all charitable organizations must take because they are required by law as well as 27 </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/6172513059617293921'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/6172513059617293921'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/10/nonprofit-panel-releases-principles-for.html' title='Nonprofit Panel Releases Principles For Good Governance'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-5386893843865201476</id><published>2007-10-15T12:04:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-10-15T12:07:40.508-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='License Suspension'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Disciplinary Proceeding'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Tennessee Uniform Administrative Procedure Act'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Tennessee'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Patient Abandonment'/><title type='text'>Miller v. Tennessee Board of Nursing</title><summary type='text'>Davidson County - This appeal involves a disciplinary proceeding against a registered nurse. After receiving a report that a registered nurse left her patients in a hospital’s medical/surgical unit before the end of her shift, the Tennessee Board of Nursing commenced a contested case proceeding to discipline the nurse. Following the hearing, the Board ordered the nurse to pay a $1,000 civil </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/5386893843865201476'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/5386893843865201476'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/10/miller-v-tennessee-board-of-nursing.html' title='Miller v. Tennessee Board of Nursing'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-7658185730342846939</id><published>2007-10-09T10:57:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-10-12T16:25:29.726-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Medicaid'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Tennessee'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='CMS'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='TennCare'/><title type='text'>CMS approves TennCare waiver</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health and Life Sciences Law Daily, October 9, 2007]The AP (10/9) reports, "The federal government has approved a three-year TennCare waiver extension that will leave the state with about $270 million less than needed to cover growing hospital costs, state officials announced today." However, the CMS-approved agreement "is an improvement over an original proposal that would have left </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/7658185730342846939'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/7658185730342846939'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/10/cms-approves-tenncare-waiver.html' title='CMS approves TennCare waiver'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-2257449187110647915</id><published>2007-10-08T16:58:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2007-10-08T16:59:19.893-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Joint Ventures'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='FTC'/><title type='text'>FTC approves doctor-hospital network integration.</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health and Life Sciences Law Daily, October 8, 2007]American Medical News (10/8, Sorrel) reports that on Sept. 17, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued an advisory opinion that "has opened the door for a physician and hospital network to contract jointly with health plans under a clinical integration program." In only the second opinion (pdf) of its kind, "the Health Care Division </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/2257449187110647915'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/2257449187110647915'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/10/ftc-approves-doctor-hospital-network.html' title='FTC approves doctor-hospital network integration.'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-315034056282347944</id><published>2007-10-08T16:38:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-10-08T16:40:02.165-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='HIT'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='NHIN'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Electronic Health Records'/><title type='text'>HHS awards $22.5 million in contracts to implement national electronic health record system.</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health and Life Science Law Daily, October 8, 2007]Modern Healthcare (10/6, DerGurahian) reported that the HHS awarded nine grants totaling $22.5 million to health information exchanges "to test implementation of a nationwide health information network, officials announced." Specifically, the grants will be used to test the Nationwide Health Information Network, or NHIN, "a trial network</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/315034056282347944'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/315034056282347944'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/10/hhs-awards-225-million-in-contracts-to.html' title='HHS awards $22.5 million in contracts to implement national electronic health record system.'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-2113445455044751169</id><published>2007-10-02T12:51:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-10-02T13:06:19.101-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Preemption'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='PMA'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='FDA'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='U.S. Supreme Court'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Medical Device'/><title type='text'>U.S. Supreme Court grants cert. to determine whether FDA premarket approval of medical device preempts state law</title><summary type='text'>The United States Supreme Court granted certification to review Riegel v. Medtronic, 451 F3d 104 (2nd Cir. 2006), to determine whether the express preemption provision of the Medical Device Amendments to the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. §360k(a), preempts state-law claims seeking damages for injuries caused by medical devices that received premarket approval (PMA) from the Food and </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/2113445455044751169'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/2113445455044751169'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/10/us-supreme-court-grants-cert-to.html' title='U.S. Supreme Court grants cert. to determine whether FDA premarket approval of medical device preempts state law'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-2545128907540463159</id><published>2007-09-28T22:55:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-28T22:59:32.672-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Joint Commission'/><title type='text'>Joint Commission revises accreditation participation requirement to include physicians</title><summary type='text'>The Joint Commission reports:Physicians and medical staff members who have concerns about the safety and quality of care at their hospital may report those concerns with the understanding that retaliatory disciplinary action is prohibited, according to explicit new rules announced today by The Joint Commission. The accreditation participation requirement previously referred generally to hospital </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/2545128907540463159'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/2545128907540463159'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/09/joint-commission-revises-accreditation.html' title='Joint Commission revises accreditation participation requirement to include physicians'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-6828150214285664943</id><published>2007-09-28T20:51:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-28T21:02:06.659-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Anti-Kickback'/><title type='text'>Hospital's proposal to compensate physicians for on-call ED coverage does not violate anti-kickback statute</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health Lawyers Weekly, Sept. 28, 2007]A medical center’s proposal to compensate physicians for providing on-call coverage does not run afoul of the Anti-Kickback Statute, the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (OIG) said in an Advisory Opinion posted September 27.Faced with a shortage of physicians willing to provide ED on-call coverage, the medical </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/6828150214285664943'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/6828150214285664943'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/09/oig-okays-hospitals-proposal-to.html' title='Hospital&apos;s proposal to compensate physicians for on-call ED coverage does not violate anti-kickback statute'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-52217723855565434</id><published>2007-09-28T09:36:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-28T22:08:02.233-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='FDA'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007'/><title type='text'>President Bush signs drug-safety bill into law.</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health and Lifes Sciences Daily, Sept. 28, 2007]The AP (9/28, Bridges) reports that on Thursday, President Bush signed the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (H.R. 3580 ), which grants the FDA "broad new powers to ensure the safety of prescription drugs used by millions of Americans." The new law reauthorizes, for five years, "programs to collect fees from drug and </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/52217723855565434'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/52217723855565434'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/09/president-bush-signs-drug-safety-bill.html' title='President Bush signs drug-safety bill into law.'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-1367101043559891997</id><published>2007-09-28T09:33:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-28T09:35:19.300-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Drugs and Devices'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Drug Safety'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='FDA'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='International Serious Adverse Events Consortium'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Genetics'/><title type='text'>FDA encourages drugmakers to study genetics and drug safety.</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health and Life Sciences Daily, Sept. 28, 2007]The New York Times (9/27, C3, Pollack) reported, "Seven of the largest pharmaceutical companies have formed a group to develop genetic tests to determine which patients would be at risk from dangerous drug side effects." The FDA has "encouraged" the formation of the group, called "the International Serious Adverse Events Consortium." One of </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/1367101043559891997'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/1367101043559891997'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/09/fda-encourages-drugmakers-to-study.html' title='FDA encourages drugmakers to study genetics and drug safety.'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-8878244425737528863</id><published>2007-09-21T16:08:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-21T16:09:35.252-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='User Fees'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Final Rule'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='CMS'/><title type='text'>CMS Issues Final Rule On “Revisit” User Fees For Healthcare Facilities Cited For Quality Deficiencies</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health Lawyer's Weekly, Sept. 21, 2007]The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued this week a final rule establishing user fees for healthcare providers and suppliers cited for deficiencies with federal quality of care requirements that require a “revisit” to ensure appropriate corrective action.The final rule is effective as of the date of its publication in the Federal</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/8878244425737528863'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/8878244425737528863'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/09/cms-issues-final-rule-on-revisit-user.html' title='CMS Issues Final Rule On “Revisit” User Fees For Healthcare Facilities Cited For Quality Deficiencies'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-707918234498500836</id><published>2007-09-21T12:50:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-21T12:52:55.164-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Managed Care'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Health Insurance'/><title type='text'>California case will test health-insurance rescission.</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health and Life Science Law Daily, Sept. 21, 2007]Law.com (9/21, Hirsch) reports that next week, California's 4th District Court of Appeal will hear arguments in the "closely watched" Hailey v. California Physicians' Service (pdf), a case that "challenges Blue Shield of California's practice of rescinding coverage based on inaccuracies in an application." The case centers the issue of "</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/707918234498500836'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/707918234498500836'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/09/california-case-will-test-health.html' title='California case will test health-insurance rescission.'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-7314714355434649680</id><published>2007-09-21T12:26:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-21T15:40:34.320-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Drugs and Devices'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='FDA'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Drug Marketing'/><title type='text'>U.S. Senate approves legislation to overhaul FDA.</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health and Life Science Law Daily, Sept. 21, 2007]The AP (9/21, Bridges) reports, "Congress sent President Bush legislation Thursday giving the Food and Drug Administration new powers to ensure the safety of prescription drugs. The Senate passed the FDA bill by voice vote Thursday, a day after the House approved it by an overwhelming margin."The Wall Street Journal (9/21, A12, Rubenstein</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/7314714355434649680'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/7314714355434649680'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/09/us-senate-approves-legislation-to.html' title='U.S. Senate approves legislation to overhaul FDA.'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-5331380706029485702</id><published>2007-09-20T10:10:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-20T10:11:22.177-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='HHS'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Biotechnology'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Genetics'/><title type='text'>HHS unveils report on personalized healthcare.</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health and Life Sciences Daily, Sept. 20, 2007]Modern Healthcare (9/20, DoBias) reports that the HHS "has unveiled a road map that would parlay current health initiatives, such as the use of information technology and evidence-based practices, into a workable system in which scientists and physicians could 'customize' the care they give to an individual based on that person's genetic </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/5331380706029485702'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/5331380706029485702'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/09/hhs-unveils-report-on-personalized.html' title='HHS unveils report on personalized healthcare.'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-318193364206329138</id><published>2007-09-20T09:40:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-20T10:02:45.032-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Drugs and Devices'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='FDA'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Drug Marketing'/><title type='text'>U.S. House passes bill to give FDA more power</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health and Life Sciences Daily, September 20, 2007]The CBS Evening News (9/19, lead story, 2:10, Couric) reported, "Congressional negotiators have agreed on an overhaul of the Food and Drug Administration to give it more power to protect us from potentially dangerous food and medications. The bill would give the FDA the power, for the first time ever, to demand studies on the safety of </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/318193364206329138'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/318193364206329138'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/09/us-house-passes-bill-to-give-fda-more.html' title='U.S. House passes bill to give FDA more power'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-4463942623223605359</id><published>2007-09-19T22:53:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-19T23:08:30.171-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Follow-on Biologics'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Biotechnology'/><title type='text'>Update on Follow-on Biologics</title><summary type='text'>In July, the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions HELP Committee gave the thumbs up to the Biologics Price Competition and Innovative Act of 2007 (S. 1695), which lays out a pathway for approving the development of follow-on biologics."This Act amends section 351 of the Public Health Service Act to provide for an approval pathway for safe biosimilar and interchangeable biological products</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/4463942623223605359'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/4463942623223605359'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/09/update-on-follow-on-biologics.html' title='Update on Follow-on Biologics'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-920192786297439757</id><published>2007-09-19T21:53:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-19T22:51:38.261-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Patents'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Biotechnology'/><title type='text'>House Passes Patent Reform Act of 2007 - Biotechs Express Concerns</title><summary type='text'>On Friday, September 7th, the House passed HR1908 (currently before the Senate, S. 1145)The bill focuses on minimizing patent litigation by making it harder to claim the infringement of intellectual property and taking away lawsuits' potential rewards. The bill calls for a first-to-file standard, allows post grant reviews, and has a narrower definition of willful infringement.See Fish &amp; </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/920192786297439757'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/920192786297439757'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/09/house-passes-patent-reform-act-of-2007.html' title='House Passes Patent Reform Act of 2007 - Biotechs Express Concerns'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-6490462658377592851</id><published>2007-09-18T12:48:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-20T12:09:19.688-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Statute of Repose'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Tennessee'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Informed Consent'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Medical Malpractice'/><title type='text'>TN Supreme Court holds that a child born alive has an independent cause of action for failure to obtain informed consent</title><summary type='text'>In, Marissa Miller, a minor, by and through her mother, and next friend, Miranda Miller v. John Dacus, M.D. - M2006-02728-SC-R23-CQ View, the Tennessee Supreme Court held that child born alive does have an independent cause of action for injuries caused by the failure of a physician to obtain informed consent from the child’s mother during labor.In 2003, the Plaintiff through her mother and next </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/6490462658377592851'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/6490462658377592851'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/09/tn-supreme-court-holds-that-child-born.html' title='TN Supreme Court holds that a child born alive has an independent cause of action for failure to obtain informed consent'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-7964244692235361340</id><published>2007-09-18T12:38:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-18T12:39:25.007-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Biotechnology'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Genetics'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Gene Therapy'/><title type='text'>NIH advisory panel says further testing needed to determine gene therapy's role in patient death.</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health and Life Sciences Law Daily, Sept. 18, 2007]The Washington Post (918, A4, Weiss) reports that according to a National Institutes of Health panel, "tests on an Illinois woman who died mysteriously in July after getting an experimental gene treatment show no evidence that she was killed directly by the genetically altered viruses she was given" by Targeted Genetics, a Seattle </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/7964244692235361340'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/7964244692235361340'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/09/nih-advisory-panel-says-further-testing.html' title='NIH advisory panel says further testing needed to determine gene therapy&apos;s role in patient death.'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-3024788857447654956</id><published>2007-09-18T12:33:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-18T12:34:58.153-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Drugs and Devices'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Drug Prices'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Health Insurance'/><title type='text'>Insurance companies limiting coverage to drugs approved by FDA in order to control costs.</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health and Life Sciences Daily, Sept. 18, 2007]The Wall Street Journal (9/18, A1, Anand) reports, "Doctors, particularly oncologists, rely on medicines approved for other diseases to try to save patients for whom all other treatments have failed. But as new medicines come to market at ever-higher prices, insurers are pushing back, limiting coverage of these drugs to only the disease for </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/3024788857447654956'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/3024788857447654956'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/09/insurance-companies-limiting-coverage.html' title='Insurance companies limiting coverage to drugs approved by FDA in order to control costs.'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-955398209607911324</id><published>2007-09-18T12:30:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-18T12:30:57.862-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Healthcare Spending'/><title type='text'>CMS report finds states differ widely in spending on healthcare.</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health and Life Science Daily, September 18, 2007]The New York Times (9/18, A22, Pear) reports that according to a study appearing in the Web edition of the journal Health Affairs, a huge variation exists "in personal health spending among states, ranging from an average of nearly $6,700 a person in Massachusetts to less than $4,000 in Utah." The study "said that Massachusetts, Maine, </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/955398209607911324'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/955398209607911324'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/09/cms-report-finds-states-differ-widely.html' title='CMS report finds states differ widely in spending on healthcare.'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-879223383998429967</id><published>2007-09-17T17:34:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-17T17:36:41.814-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Statutes and Regulations'/><title type='text'>Health Law Statutes and Regulations</title><summary type='text'>I've recently posted a list of commonly used Health Law Statutes and Regultions here.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/879223383998429967'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/879223383998429967'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/09/health-law-statutes-and-regulations.html' title='Health Law Statutes and Regulations'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-2673077342823792788</id><published>2007-09-17T16:33:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-17T16:34:34.602-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='CMS'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Stark Laws'/><title type='text'>New CMS Stark rules expand physician recruiting exception, removes some "bright-line" rules.</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health and Life Sciences Law Daily, September 17, 2007]American Medical News (9/24, Glendinning) reports that on August 27, the CMS "unveiled the phase III, or final, version of the prohibitions known informally as the Stark II rules." AMNews continues, "In the final rule, CMS did not make any sweeping changes to the existing prohibitions. It contains no new exceptions for physicians, </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/2673077342823792788'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/2673077342823792788'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/09/new-cms-stark-rules-expand-physician.html' title='New CMS Stark rules expand physician recruiting exception, removes some &quot;bright-line&quot; rules.'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-563073362673313118</id><published>2007-09-17T15:58:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-22T19:34:00.536-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Biotechnology'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Genetics'/><title type='text'>Genetic Technologies and the Law</title><summary type='text'>Notes on genetic technologies and the law are now available here.Notes include information relating to the following:- Access to and disclosure of genetic information: rights, duties, and liabilities- Legal issues in genetics research involving human subjects- Commercialization of genetic tests and products- Clinical applications of genetics: Genetic testing and legal liability[More notes will be</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/563073362673313118'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/563073362673313118'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/09/genetic-technologies-and-law.html' title='Genetic Technologies and the Law'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-8073520876322977961</id><published>2007-09-13T20:57:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-13T22:20:35.208-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Tennessee'/><title type='text'>Tennessee Case Reviews</title><summary type='text'>Covenants Not to CompeteHLD, v. 33, n. 8 (August 2005)]Tennessee Supreme Court holds covenants not to compete in physician contracts Are unenforceable as a matter of public policy.  Such agreements are permissible in two limited circumstances, which themselves include certain restrictions, as specified by state statute--namely, when the employer is a hospital or an affiliate of a hospital, and </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/8073520876322977961'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/8073520876322977961'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/09/tennessee-case-reviews.html' title='Tennessee Case Reviews'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-4496810468648197718</id><published>2007-09-13T10:01:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-13T10:02:12.759-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Medicare'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Transparency'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='CMS'/><title type='text'>Acting CMS administrator vows to introduce more agency transparency.</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health and Life Sciences Law Daily, September 13, 2007]Modern Healthcare (9/13, Lubeli) reports that Kerry Weems, acting CMS administrator, "laid out his agenda to reporters and promised to introduce more transparency in the way the CMS does business. Starting at the end of the month, for example, all corrective-action measures between the CMS and Medicare Advantage plans will be made </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/4496810468648197718'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/4496810468648197718'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/09/acting-cms-administrator-vows-to.html' title='Acting CMS administrator vows to introduce more agency transparency.'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-693372381364850576</id><published>2007-09-13T09:59:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-13T10:00:28.062-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Class-Action'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='ADA'/><title type='text'>Community Health Systems agrees on settlement in class-action ADA lawsuit.</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health and Life Sciences Law Daily, September 13, 2007]The Tucson Explorer News (9/12, Stebbins) reported that "Community Health Systems, parent company of Northwest Medical Center, has reached a settlement with plaintiffs in a class-action lawsuit filed in 2003 involving physical access barriers at Northwest's Oro Valley facilities." Still awaiting approval by the U.S. District Court, </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/693372381364850576'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/693372381364850576'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/09/community-health-systems-agrees-on.html' title='Community Health Systems agrees on settlement in class-action ADA lawsuit.'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-5442693930386636660</id><published>2007-09-13T00:53:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-13T00:57:40.612-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Self-Referral'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Medicare'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Joint Ventures'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='CMS'/><title type='text'>Feds Crack Down on Physician ‘Self-Referral’</title><summary type='text'>[Source: WSJ Health Blog, posted by Jacob Goldstein]Docs make lots of money by investing in medical facilities — like surgery centers and MRI shops — and then sending their patients to them for care. The consultants at McKinsey figure the profit to doctors from this self-dealing runs in the neighborhood of $8 billion a year.Medicare doesn’t like it, citing overuse, and could soon begin denying </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/5442693930386636660'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/5442693930386636660'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/09/feds-crack-down-on-physician-self.html' title='Feds Crack Down on Physician ‘Self-Referral’'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-265666046794121478</id><published>2007-09-12T09:29:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-12T09:30:25.592-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Hospitalists'/><title type='text'>Society of Hospital Medicine says number of hospitalists has "exploded."</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health and Lifes Sciences Daily, September 12, 2007]The Washington Post (9/11, HE1, Baker) reported that "despite resistance from primary-care physicians and fears that the development could erode continuity of care," the number of hospitalists has "exploded" from "a few hundred" in 1997 to 20,000, which is "the fastest growth for any medical specialty in the country," according to the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/265666046794121478'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/265666046794121478'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/09/society-of-hospital-medicine-says.html' title='Society of Hospital Medicine says number of hospitalists has &quot;exploded.&quot;'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-7418803920457492695</id><published>2007-09-08T19:31:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-08T19:46:55.993-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Community Benefit Standard'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Nonprofit Healthcare Representation'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Tax Exemption'/><title type='text'>Notes on "community benefit standard" for tax-exempt status</title><summary type='text'>[Source: "Update: IRS 'Community Benefit' Compliance Check" by Michael Peregrine et al.]The community benefit standard serves as the principal standard under which most modern-day hospitals derive their tax-exempt status under Code § 501(c)(3).The community benefit standard was not adopted by federal legislation but, rather, was adopted by the IRS primarily in a 1969 revenue ruling (Rev. Rul. 69-</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/7418803920457492695'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/7418803920457492695'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/09/notes-on-community-benefit-standard-for.html' title='Notes on &quot;community benefit standard&quot; for tax-exempt status'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-7605424069468773042</id><published>2007-09-08T18:15:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-08T18:18:47.590-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Healthcare Directors'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Governance'/><title type='text'>Important governance issues for healthcare entities</title><summary type='text'>[Source: "Current Perspectives on Healthcare GovernanceA Roundtable Discussion Among Experts: Part II", AHLA]Excerpt:Mr. Silverman: Mr. Schwartz, lets focus on today’s governance environment at the state level nationally. What are the most important governance issues you can suggest to a nonprofit board going forward, to steer the organization in ways that would negate, or lessen, negative </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/7605424069468773042'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/7605424069468773042'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/09/important-governance-issues-for.html' title='Important governance issues for healthcare entities'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-8555637447399225781</id><published>2007-09-08T18:04:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-08T18:09:22.835-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Document Retention Policies'/><title type='text'>Document Retention/Destruction Policy Considerations for Healthcare Entities</title><summary type='text'>[Source: "Current Perspectives on Healthcare Governance: A Roundtable Discussion Among Experts: Part I", AHLA]Excerpt:Mr. Silverman: Mr. Levine, what is the most important federal statute that addresses document destruction, and one to keep in mind when a company is designing and implementing its document retention policy?Mr. Levine: In my view, it is 18 U.S.C § 1519, added to the criminal code </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/8555637447399225781'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/8555637447399225781'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/09/document-retentiondestruction-policy.html' title='Document Retention/Destruction Policy Considerations for Healthcare Entities'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-614201890963244635</id><published>2007-09-08T17:45:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-08T18:04:53.773-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Corporate Fraud'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Criminal Prosecution'/><title type='text'>Important considerations regarding federal prosecution of healthcare entities</title><summary type='text'>[Source: "Current Perspectives on Healthcare Governance: A Roundtable Discussion Among Experts: Part I", AHLA]Some Department of Justice policies for pursuing criminal charges:Prior criminal history, rogue employee or pervasive institutional conduct, severity of conduct and victim impact, adequacy of compliance programs, remedial efforts and disciplinary sanctions, self-disclosure and cooperation</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/614201890963244635'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/614201890963244635'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/09/important-considerations-regarding.html' title='Important considerations regarding federal prosecution of healthcare entities'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-110080412504527097</id><published>2007-09-08T17:35:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-08T17:44:37.853-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Nonprofit Healthcare Representation'/><title type='text'>Important issues to consider when representing nonprofit healthcare clients</title><summary type='text'>Counsel should be current on:developments in state charitable trust law, including guidance from the state Attorney General on matters of governance and fiduciary duty;federal tax law developments and IRS announcements concerning executive compensation, conflicts of interest, and excess benefit transactions;guidance from rating agencies concerning governance for tax exempt bond issuers;general </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/110080412504527097'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/110080412504527097'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/09/important-issues-to-consider-when.html' title='Important issues to consider when representing nonprofit healthcare clients'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-1189910438004649752</id><published>2007-09-08T01:14:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-08T01:16:20.502-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Joint Commission'/><title type='text'>Joint Commission Clarifies Rule Prohibiting Retaliation For Reporting Quality Concerns</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health Law Weekly, September 7, 2007]The Joint Commission announced September 6 a revised accreditation participation requirement that explicitly provides that physicians and medical staff may report quality of care concerns with the knowledge that the hospital is prohibited from taking any retaliatory action.Although the previous requirement referred to general hospital staff, it was </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/1189910438004649752'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/1189910438004649752'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/09/joint-commission-clarifies-rule.html' title='Joint Commission Clarifies Rule Prohibiting Retaliation For Reporting Quality Concerns'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-976849022614464957.post-3407052086684095524</id><published>2007-09-08T00:39:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-08T16:46:35.645-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Drugs and Devices'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Drug Prices'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='RICO'/><title type='text'>U.S. Court In Massachusetts Certifies RICO Class Action Against Two Companies On Charges Of Fraudulently Marking Up Drug Prices</title><summary type='text'>[Source: Health Lawyers Weekly, September 7, 2007]The U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts certified as a class action August 27 a lawsuit brought on behalf of individual consumers and health plans claiming that McKesson Corporation (McKesson) and First DataBank, Inc. (FDB) violated the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), as well as California state law, by</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/3407052086684095524'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/976849022614464957/posts/default/3407052086684095524'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/09/us-court-in-massachusetts-certifies.html' title='U.S. Court In Massachusetts Certifies RICO Class Action Against Two Companies On Charges Of Fraudulently Marking Up Drug Prices'/><author><name>Kevin A Page</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry></feed>
